I grok the ones who said Yakky (I don't count you as dating him, though I'm not as sure about whether you've been having *sex* with him lately), and I realize I should've clicked sithjawa, since I clicked "your Pretty" (I consider a relationship to equate dating, whether you can go on physical dates or not), but I can never remember which username she is (you know I'm bad with names). My brain just thinks of her as "Steph", since I don't read her journal.
What *really* confuses me, though, are the two that clicked Darkside, and the two that clicked VOTANIA!!
::brain reeling::
Umm. Are they *reading* your journal? Or some AU-version thereof?
Well, votania was one of them, as it was too good for her snarky sense of humor to pass up (yes, I said "seriously" in there; nope, she wasn't being serious; oh well... ), and the other... is hookncrook, who may have missed out on the nuances like the fact that votania and I *aren't* dating each other.
Byron (Rainstorm13) evidently considers the Not!A!Relationship! that Darkside and I have going on as sufficient. Dunno about Wolfieboy.
As much as you love Darkside, it requires both parties to agree upon a relationship for it to BE a relationship of the dating kind. As long as he continues to *say* no, it will still not be dating. IMO.
no subject
What *really* confuses me, though, are the two that clicked Darkside, and the two that clicked VOTANIA!!
::brain reeling::
Umm. Are they *reading* your journal? Or some AU-version thereof?
no subject
Byron (Rainstorm13) evidently considers the Not!A!Relationship! that Darkside and I have going on as sufficient. Dunno about Wolfieboy.
Re:
no subject