Religiously imposed self-control

[azurelunatic]

There are systems of belief that require that their adherents abstain from doing some activity or other. It could be with the sex thing, it could be pork, it could be using any Microsoft product.

Yeah, it's something you don't want your coreligionists doing. But, if the test is of your self-control, does it not say something more for the self control to have done it and liked it and not do it again because of the faith you have?

Conversely, it says your self-control's for shit if you have done it once and then continue to do it on the grounds that you're already damned. It is possible to reformat your hard drive and reinstall Mandrake.

Put down the AOL coffee coaster.

No one gets hurt.

Comments

[azurelunatic]

Dear me.

Did someone not study his theology?

Re:

[iroshi.livejournal.com]

Most of them don't study their theology, no. Why do you think so many people asked M* and I if we were attending seminary, whenever we started talking to them about such matters? Most cultural Christians assume that anyone who actually *thinks* about these things and studies them (because they're *important*, damn it, if that's your *religion*) must therefore be considering the ministry. ::sighs and rolls her eyes::

[azurelunatic]

Actually, to be fair to all theoretical parties involved, someone very dear and close to me is quitting with the sex thing, mostly, trying to ease out of it rather than stopping cold turkey.

This easing out happened, of course, *after* the little identity crisis. ^-^ Who, me evil?