azurelunatic: DW: my eloquence cannot be captured in 140 chars (twitter)
Azure Jane Lunatic (Azz) 🌺 ([personal profile] azurelunatic) wrote2010-03-30 11:55 pm
  • Add Memory
  • Share This Entry
Entry tags:

20 tweets for 2010-3-30

In the last 24 hours, I posted the following to Twitter:


Follow me on Twitter.
Threaded | Top-Level Comments Only
ext_3038: Red Panda with the captain "Oh Hai!" (Default)

[identity profile] triadruid.livejournal.com 2010-03-31 03:50 pm (UTC)(link)
OK, so what are you doing differently to post your twitter stuff that makes it unfilterable? Not using LoudTwitter, obviously, but what exactly is going on?
azurelunatic: Vivid pink Alaskan wild rose. (Default)

[personal profile] azurelunatic 2010-03-31 05:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Not sure entirely how the filter thing you're using works, but peering at someone else's Twitter import with ?nohtml=1, that's wrapped in a <div class=loudtwitter>, so I bet it's looking for that, and not finding it.
wibbble: A manipulated picture of my eye, with a blue swirling background. (Default)

[personal profile] wibbble 2010-03-31 05:41 pm (UTC)(link)
It's a custom script, not LoudTwitter or Twittinesis. It's not that it's doing anything to 'make it unfilterable' - it's that your filter isn't a 'Twitter filter' it's a 'LoudTwitter filter'.
azurelunatic: Vivid pink Alaskan wild rose. (Default)

[personal profile] azurelunatic 2010-03-31 05:47 pm (UTC)(link)
And Twittinesis is using the "loudtwitter" div class too, which is probably why it gets filtered.
ext_3038: Pseudocode for "If nothing else, remember this." (codemonkey)

[identity profile] triadruid.livejournal.com 2010-03-31 07:45 pm (UTC)(link)
Okay, sorry for being imprecise. By not using a CSS class, it becomes impossible to filter it using the 'normal' methods. If it used any class declaration I could use that to hide it (just most of the big ones use loudtwitter by default).
Edited 2010-03-31 19:49 (UTC)
ext_3038: Pseudocode for "If nothing else, remember this." (codemonkey)

Yep

[identity profile] triadruid.livejournal.com 2010-03-31 07:47 pm (UTC)(link)

.loudtwitter {
display: none!important
}
wibbble: A manipulated picture of my eye, with a blue swirling background. (Default)

[personal profile] wibbble 2010-03-31 10:05 pm (UTC)(link)
Depending on the power of whatever tool you're using, you could hide the grandparent of the first 'a' tag whose href attribute matches 'http://twitter.com/azurelunatic/statuses/'.

If you wanted to be extra careful, you could check that the grandparent is a ul tag.

The ul tag matches the CSS selector '#content-wrapper ul', if it's any help. You'd still need to check for references to Twitter, though - squashing just '#content-wrapper ul' would kill ANY unordered lists, which probably isn't good.

OTOH, there's exactly two people in the world using this particular Twitter posting script, so you could just live with it. :o)
azurelunatic: Vivid pink Alaskan wild rose. (Default)

[personal profile] azurelunatic 2010-03-31 10:08 pm (UTC)(link)
Though he is reading one of the verbose ones!

(I wouldn't object to it being wrapped up in a distinctive/descriptive class for my tweets, if you're inclined to do some poking; if you're not, I wouldn't object either. Picking the 'twitter' userpic would be nice, though. Again, if you're inclined to poke.)
wibbble: A manipulated picture of my eye, with a blue swirling background. (Default)

[personal profile] wibbble 2010-03-31 10:13 pm (UTC)(link)
I think I have you beaten on verbosity - 'The last 121 things I posted to Twitter' appeared on my LJ on Monday. ;o)

I'll look at it if I get a chance tomorrow. I thought it was already selecting a userpic?
azurelunatic: Vivid pink Alaskan wild rose. (Default)

[personal profile] azurelunatic 2010-03-31 10:17 pm (UTC)(link)
This is true; especially when I'm on the old slow computer and I use Notepad more than Twitter.

I've been editing and selecting the userpic manually after it posts.
wibbble: A manipulated picture of my eye, with a blue swirling background. (Default)

[personal profile] wibbble 2010-03-31 10:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, okay. Must have been someone else I set that up for.

It can definitely be done. In fact, I think I'm doing it for my own posts!
Threaded | Top-Level Comments Only