Azure Jane Lunatic (Azz) 🌺 (
azurelunatic) wrote2002-09-15 06:02 pm
Vocabulary
Votania: "There's been a hooker on the corner by the phones."
Nephew: "A what?"
Votania: *wince*
Azz: "A courtesan."
Votania: //Nice save.//
Nephew: "A courtesan?"
Votania: "A naughty girl. He's gotta learn sometime."
Azz: "A girl who stays up way too late, and is out on the street when she ought to be home in bed."
Votania: "Good definition."
Azz: "Among other things."
Votania: "Uh-huh."
Nephew: "A what?"
Votania: *wince*
Azz: "A courtesan."
Votania: //Nice save.//
Nephew: "A courtesan?"
Votania: "A naughty girl. He's gotta learn sometime."
Azz: "A girl who stays up way too late, and is out on the street when she ought to be home in bed."
Votania: "Good definition."
Azz: "Among other things."
Votania: "Uh-huh."

no subject
(And if you say yes, I'd *really* like to hear the justification of why it's not wrong to sleep around, but is wrong to charge for a physical service...)
no subject
Have not yet catalogued all of Votania's thoughts regarding LPST's, and the various subclasses within.
no subject
My opinions about sex are often tangled and conflicting. I, myself, would prefer to only have sex with a partner who I would not have to have Great Drama with if there were a child born; I'd prefer someone of above-average intelligence and other desired genetic traits.
Re:
This attempt at connecting the two causes much prejudice, in my experience. *I* wouldn't do that, therefore it's wrong for *them* to do that.
Would I become a prostitute if it were legal and a safe profession? Umm. Still, no. It's not something I could do without going crazy. That doesn't invalidate the profession, nor justify disdain of those who are capable of it.
I like your use of referring to them as LPSTs. They don't, regrettably, exist yet. They're not licensed, and they're not therapists. But they are selling a valid service, and as worthy of respect as a shoeshiner, or a cook. Of course, as I said, the profession being illegal at the moment, most of the people *in* the profession are not worthy of respect, but that's a case-by-case judgment call. I've met chefs I don't respect, either...but it's not their profession I judge them by.
no subject
no subject
I idealize Spider Robinson's vision of prostitution as a revered profession for those suited to it. I am not suited to it. I would probably think more fondly on the profession as practiced locally if people who were suited to it were directed to it, and people who were not suited to it (those who are only in the business because they have no other job opportunities, etc.) would not remain in the business long.
I think my mixed attitude comes from the concept that it could be a very good and worthwhile profession, both to the practitioner and the customer, but that it is suffering from the prejudice that sex is evil, especially when used outside of marriage, and is viewed as the last-resort job of someone who has nowhere else to turn to.
I'm also leery because of the idea that many, many prostitutes are also abusers of various drugs; this is perhaps my biggest reason for being wary of the variety of prostitute one would find on the corner where the phone booths are.
no subject
I spent a few hours stuttering and shivering to Darkside regarding this guy. The thought of him still gives me the creeps.
Re:
I agree with this paragraph entirely, dear, but realize what you are saying. As I said before, prostitution is *illegal* in most of this country, and that means that only those people who are desperate enough to follow a job path that makes them avoid the law are going to be doing it. It's not the JOB that is morally wrong, though, just because in this culture, only those with low moralities take the job, if you can understand the distinction.
I don't think drugs are evil, either, and I don't think there's anything morally wrong with selling drugs. That doesn't mean I want to go hang out with your average drug dealer, because right now, drugs are *illegal*, and that means it's the criminal element who are selling them. It's like outlawing guns and then only criminals will have guns...it's not owning the gun that makes them people I don't want to hang around. It's that the law is set up so that the people I want to hang around aren't going to own the guns, or sell drugs, or be sex workers, because the kind of people I want to hang around tend to avoid things that would send them to jail, ain't it?
(Heh, I've been reading
no subject
I don't enjoy the company of immoral scum; anyone I find working an illegal job is likely to be immoral scum.