azurelunatic | I don't usually do this. (Losers, easy amusement thereat, plus random kid stuff as bonus)

It takes a pretty good friend so either one of us will go and flame away anywhere.

But I was in the mood for some cheap entertainment, and so was Dagger, so... heh.

The flaming is spread out over here, here, and first but by no means least, here.

garnetdagger is in fine form, no longer feeling envious of N* for N*'s having gotten to come out earlier today (and she informs me that really, her name should be properly abbreviated N%, so I shall...) (and uh-oh, N% and Marah seem to have crafted a strategic alliance, which is scarier than it could be, but is not as scary as it ought to be...), as now Dagger has also had a chance to get some good time in.

So, all in all, it's been an excellent day but for the stuff with the Viking, but he seems to be doing all right now, and is not needing to seek Sanctuary here tonight. The Little Fayoumis does not understand the depth of the offense against the Viking, but why the Viking was sad was explained to him effectively, and it's an acceptable reason to be upset, even for a grown-up.

LF came to class with me tonight, and introduced himself to Mr. Demland. He sat relatively quietly and wrote on paper with the 10-colored dildo pen. Then I ran him around the courtyard to tire him out, had him sit through another hour of class, where he "read" my SQL book. Sooo cute! I ran him around the courtyard some more, so he was preternaturally quiet and well-behaved when Marx came to pick him up.

*giggle*

Wimps. If you have to prove yourself not a wimp when someone calls you one, you're proving yourself even more of one.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

Not in person, but online, yes.

As well as through other people, some of whom are in-person friends.

Otherwise I would not have been as free with our comments.

At the risk of sounding rude or overly critical, which I don't mean to, can you be sure that someone you don't know in real life is not in the wrong or making things up? I'm not saying that she is... it just seems hard for me to understand how one would *know* she wasn't, with enough assurance to want to attack the other party.

I mean, there are good online friends, yes, but as long as we only know someone online, we have the opportunity to convey a certain picture of ourselves to them that may or may not be an accurate or complete representation.

I don't have that 100% assurance, but the combination of sources, plus the subsequent behaviour, was enough for my satisfaction.

Ah. Just curious. I respect that you and I are motivated by different things.

The fact that Azz knows and trusts me implicitly, and *I* know

nalidoll in person, and know the situation first hand, and Azz has met

gremliness in person, who has also been a firsthand witness to the activities of the Beastling, having been a guest in the apartment of Nali and said BL for a time...

Azz has it on good authority, whom she trusts, that the facts of the case are correct.

And his telling of "his side of the story" is so incoherent, and he is so incapable of actually making himself believable (he claims to have been arrested for merely "venting"...when the charge, dear readers, was *assault*), that nearly *anyone* can be quite clear that Nali is, in fact, telling the truth.

*sigh*

And you neither sound rude nor overly critical, you merely sound concerned, and discerning. This is completely and utterly acceptable and something we highly admire in people. :) Go you!

Ah, this does make sense... I know that Azz seems to trust you a lot. :)

Thanks for explaining.

gremliness, the other Woman On the Scene, was a houseguest here for a week before showing up into that situation.

Never mind the Othersenses that were pinged by it when I heard about it,

gremliness took a good long look at it, and quite carefully and critically gave the rundown on it to anyone who cared to listen in her journal.

And, about the assault: The police showed up, for what sounded to them like a routine case of potential domestic violence, to be headed off with shelter to get the two potential combatants apart, and the usual referrals ... until the Beastling behaved in such a manner that they decided they would go very carefully over Nali's accounting of the situation, and found that in fact, there had been assault, and that was that. Venting shouldn't ever venture into assault...

Yeah, I do understand about the Othersense too... it just takes a LOT before I will get in the middle of *anything* unless it involves 1 of maybe 4 extremely special people being badly wronged, in which case death will ensue.

But that's me, and I'm rather isolationist. I'll listen and talk and stay largely uninvolved other than that in most cases. I've been bitched at for that tendency more than once.

She was on IM with me, and we've all been stressing over the issue of this luser. So she declared it Open Season on him. Since we've all been holding back any comments to him, such as gently worded "Are you sure you're considering her perspective here?" things while she was with him, for fear of making things worse, now that they're apart....

...Kaboom.

As far as I can see, as far as LJ's TOS are concerned, he's the aggressor in her journal, and we have been given permission to have at him in that forum...

garnetdagger was doing most of the talking, and she's been known to mix it up with

votania's mother, who we all have to get along with, on occasion, when it warrants... and that was on far less ammunition than this.

I probably would have limited it to a very few comments, but since Nali was delighting in everyone saying all the things she was too afraid to even think, and we were delighting in getting them said, and he was *not* helping his own cause any (care to dig yourself any deeper there, Boy?) ... *giggle* I probably wouldn't have taken it that far if he hadn't been so easy to tease...

You know how trolls make the provocative comments on forums, and then taunt all the easy targets who respond? He did his own trolling...

Yeah, I'm not trying to *at all* say that you behaved badly, trust me.

*giggle* It was just so delicious!

I was at first worried that I hadn't saved enough left for the others, but there was evidently plenty of Beastling to go around...

Well, I'm glad you all enjoyed yourselves. :)

Oh yes. It is delicious carnage, and I am exercising some mild html and using strike and red font color and correcting some of his less-coherent statements.

Yeah, I saw some of that. :D

I don't usually do this. (Losers, easy amusement thereat, plus random kid stuff as bonus)

no subject

Re:

no subject

Re:

no subject

Re:

no subject

Re:

no subject

Re:

no subject

Re:

no subject

Re: