azurelunatic: Vivid pink Alaskan wild rose. (Default)
Azure Jane Lunatic (Azz) 🌺 ([personal profile] azurelunatic) wrote2003-04-13 11:59 am

goin' down...

I scored
46¾%
on the classic 400 Point Purity Test!
Take the test here!

[identity profile] melcocha.livejournal.com 2003-04-13 01:41 pm (UTC)(link)
Damn it. I'm still 70 1/4 per cent pure. I need tips! And sex on a roof, apparently.

[identity profile] iroshi.livejournal.com 2003-04-13 03:45 pm (UTC)(link)
I haven't done that one, either. Now, if it had had a check box for *necking or petting* on a roof, I could have checked that, but it didn't...

[identity profile] n3m3sis42.livejournal.com 2003-04-13 02:13 pm (UTC)(link)
Yay! I thought I was the only one with a score around that range until you and [profile] eisenhund posted yours. Almost everyone else on my Friends page had scores in the 70s and above.

[identity profile] iroshi.livejournal.com 2003-04-13 03:54 pm (UTC)(link)
I looked and don't see your score, but I was going to post a note of poking tease at Azz that my score was actually lower than hers. ^_~

Although, admittedly, I *do* have a few more years of experience on her, but hey, 9 of those were spent as a submissive Christian housewife!!! (Although...it was during that marriage that I racked up the ability to list off 'sex in every room in the house except children's bedrooms'.)

Hey, since we're discussing this...can either of you give me examples of what friggin' furniture the damn test was talking about when it said sex on furniture that is NOT a bed, table/desk, countertop, or otherwise designed to be used as a table or for sitting on? E and I were talking, and we can't think of ANYTHING that doesn't fall under those categories! What's left - a TV? My drumset? I don't tend to think of those as *furniture*, I think of them as *appliances*. Anything I could come up with that was *furniture* fell under the category of "designed for table or sitting on". What isn't?

(We're going to help E lower her score by baking some cannabis into the brownies...)

Re:

[identity profile] n3m3sis42.livejournal.com 2003-04-13 06:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I posted mine as Friends Only. I am a little weird about what I will and will not post publicly.

Hmmmm, I was going to say washer or dryer, but those are also appliances. A bookcase, maybe? But the logistics of that would be odd. Oh, I know! *dingdingding* A dresser?

Re:

[identity profile] iroshi.livejournal.com 2003-04-13 07:50 pm (UTC)(link)
Technically, I would have to agree with you, except that they specifically included in the text of the test. And you set stuff on the top of the dresser the same way you do a counter.

However, if a dresser does, in fact, count as furniture that is not a table or designed to be used as a table...I might be able to click on that one, then. I have to think about it...I've had sex on a hell of a lot of pieces of furniture in a hell of a lot of rooms (11-year-marriage, and then an almost 3-year-marriage so far to a highly position-inventive man). I'll have to think and see if I've ever used a dresser... ^_~

[identity profile] eisenhund.livejournal.com 2003-04-14 10:39 am (UTC)(link)
Ottoman.

[identity profile] elance.livejournal.com 2003-04-13 03:41 pm (UTC)(link)
I haven't had sex in enough weird places yet. *grin* On the locality section? I marked NOTHING. *glares*

[identity profile] iroshi.livejournal.com 2003-04-13 03:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, well, once the roommate is gone, I'll gladly expand the rooms...but if you think I'm *ever* having sex out of doors, you've got another think COMING, woman. *I* am not the exhibitionist in this pair.

[identity profile] merlyn-magick.livejournal.com 2003-04-14 06:42 am (UTC)(link)
Heh. Someone with a score close to mine - yay!!! All I've seen are 70% and 80% scores. I took it the other day (in [livejournal.com profile] stellamara's journal and got a 32 1\4. Go me! If I could figure out how to post the previous test results I'd do it, but it's Monday morning, so I need my coffee. Speaking of which...

[identity profile] merlyn-magick.livejournal.com 2003-04-14 11:06 am (UTC)(link)
Hehe. I know that silly. It's trying to figure out which part of the code is just solely the quiz, and not LJ formatting or comments. Plus, out of general respect, I don't usually link to someone's journal without permission. Couldn't decifer the code at 8 am on Monday with no caffeine....

[identity profile] eisenhund.livejournal.com 2003-04-14 10:05 am (UTC)(link)


Is it cheating on the "sex in church/with a church official" questions, if sex is a sacrament in one's chosen faith?