Azure Jane Lunatic (Azz) 🌺 (
azurelunatic) wrote2003-08-29 01:03 am
Gor (regarding List discussions)
I have read all sorts of things, and I have liked them or not liked them. I am the sort of person whose reaction to book-burnings is to false-politely suggest with the "I am showing my teeth and it is not a smile" expression, that perhaps the roles of burner and burnee should be reversed.
The Gor book that
boojum gave me, which I read perhaps the first twenty pages of, is so far one of the only books I actively wish to destroy.
I have read S.M. Stirling's Draka books. I enjoyed them, because as much as they horrified and squicked me, they are well-written, well-crafted, and ... *shudder* I'm glad that I've witnessed the author himself say onlist that, were they real, he'd be one of the first ones in with a backpack nuke.
It's really not fair to compare Gor to the Draka. Gor is a fantasy. I have also read fantasies that squicked me. (Fantasy in this case would be "dream of the author, unlikely to be carried out" rather than the sword-and-sorcery genre.)
pyrogenic had a particularly ... vivid ... one at the Wash some years back. ("the Wash": a web page with classic e-mail forwards "cleaned up" and presented in a static format.) It was about an office that decided to implement the practice of office whores, and it crept gradually from something on the bare edge of plausibility into... not. And it squicked me more and more the more I read, and finally I had to quit reading it because it disturbed me so much.
This differs from Gor in that I didn't stop reading the Gor book because the practices detailed within completely disgusted me, it was because I could not wrap my mind around the self-satisfied purple prose that the fucking thing was written in. I was left with no desire to do anything with the office whore story other than not read it; Gor left me with the desire to break out FatherSir's propane weed-burner torch.
I suppose my point is this: everyone has fantasies, and Your Kink May Well Be My Squick. (Like mpreg. I can't get my mind around that, even though I'm writing one just to prove that it can be written well.) But for the love of gods, even though it may be squicky as all goatfuck, that's no excuse for poor writing.
The Gor book that
I have read S.M. Stirling's Draka books. I enjoyed them, because as much as they horrified and squicked me, they are well-written, well-crafted, and ... *shudder* I'm glad that I've witnessed the author himself say onlist that, were they real, he'd be one of the first ones in with a backpack nuke.
It's really not fair to compare Gor to the Draka. Gor is a fantasy. I have also read fantasies that squicked me. (Fantasy in this case would be "dream of the author, unlikely to be carried out" rather than the sword-and-sorcery genre.)
This differs from Gor in that I didn't stop reading the Gor book because the practices detailed within completely disgusted me, it was because I could not wrap my mind around the self-satisfied purple prose that the fucking thing was written in. I was left with no desire to do anything with the office whore story other than not read it; Gor left me with the desire to break out FatherSir's propane weed-burner torch.
I suppose my point is this: everyone has fantasies, and Your Kink May Well Be My Squick. (Like mpreg. I can't get my mind around that, even though I'm writing one just to prove that it can be written well.) But for the love of gods, even though it may be squicky as all goatfuck, that's no excuse for poor writing.

no subject
I'm not usually up for book burning either, in this case, I think we should burn the author.
no subject
But I could never understand *wanting* to be a permanent bondslave. It's just not a mindset I can wrap my mind around. I know it exists - not all Gorean masters are assholes, believe it or not. (Oh, mind you, most of them are. The newbies, mostly, from what I've seen online; they tend to drop off within a few years.) But the oldline ones who actually *care* about their slaves? *shrug* Well, if I can meet a Gorean slave and purposefully scan them, and be content that they're *actually* HAPPY about their situation, and they've been in it for years? Then I can't condemn the whole thing offhand. I just can't.
no subject
Like I've said, I HAVE met people who do this sanely, and I'm glad they are doing something that makes them happy and that it's an okay situation...but there are just so many who aren't that way :(
no subject
no subject
no subject
hey, sorry I forgot to call you back yesterday, but between cracking up about the Ned Flander's cable box and then the squirrel homage (lol!) it just kind of got spaced :) Hubby's going to be home shortly and I might go run an errand but if you have no plans tonight I may give you a ring! (on the phone..not jewelry..don't mind me, wierd mood day)
no subject
(Who, me, hyper?)
no subject
But what's mpreg? (I say, although I may regret knowing; I regret ignorance more, though.)
no subject
no subject
The vast majority of them are bad. I'm trying to write a story where it's actually got a reason to be in the story other than "The author thought it would be SO HOT OMG LOL!!!"
It's eerily easy.
no subject
Or could I be making to much of it?
no subject
That wasn't Gor, if so. Gor is worse.
no subject
"Disturbed" is the what I was thinking at the time.
no subject
No argument there.
no subject
I've been kicking around for a while the problem of squicky kinky stuff. What stuff which I would find unacceptable in real life is acceptable for me to read about or see and which isn't?[1] Does it matter if the unacceptable views are reinforced by society or not? Does it matter if it's visual or words, and if so, in which way? I think there is harmful porn, but not all porn is harmful, and which porn is harmful depends on a whole host of other factors I can't figure out, probably some of which are person-dependent. I also think trying to ban porn in general terms results in more of the harmful stuff being produced, but I can't argue that at all well.
[1] I'm not asking other people this question about me; I'm putting this question forward as a thinking question that can be used by anybody about themselves or just for general discussion of the idea. I just can't phrase it clearly enough to make that obvious.
no subject
I think harmful factors in anything include:
Encouragement of disrespect
Unprovoked cruelty (in BDSM, where seemingly-unprovoked cruelty is part of a scene, the scene is the provoking agent)
Violations of the safe/sane/consensual rule in a context that suggests it's OK to do this outside of a purely fictional environment
Boredom given or implied as a good reason to fuck the next thing that moves (actors who don't look like they care what is going on and just want it to get over with, for example)
Abnormal body types being billed as normal body types
Normal body types being billed as abnormal body types