azurelunatic: Vivid pink Alaskan wild rose. (Default)
Azure Jane Lunatic (Azz) 🌺 ([personal profile] azurelunatic) wrote2004-03-21 04:24 pm

Back from the salt mines

Worked my shift, came home. I sat next to the Chatty Lady, which was a good thing as we were both incredibly bored, and on BTS Replacement, one of the most boring surveys on earth that hardly anyone either qualifies to complete or wants to complete.

By dint of making up little sheets with times written down so I could cross off the time that had already passed and see how much time there was remaining, diligent gossiping, and random writing, I made it through the shift. I didn't get told that I was going to hell, and I only got cussed at the once. No bad Do Not Call List morons (someone is only a Do Not Call List moron if they will not listen to/believe the fact that phone research can call any bloody where they please, pretty much, except cellphones, where we apologize & hang up) and ... not much else. People were at church or leaving for same.

Another day, another $8.50 + $0.50 weekend bonus an hour.

Do Not Call issues

[identity profile] boojum.livejournal.com 2004-03-21 05:36 pm (UTC)(link)
I disagree with you rather strongly on this issue.

I find all strangers who call me for purposes unrelated to me annoying, whether or not they're legally allowed to. I also tend to think of all phone-botherers, whether they're trying to sell things, calling to beg money for charities, calling for surveys, calling to talk about the Bible, or calling because the local high school is unable to remove our phone number from its records, as telemarketers. Yes, this is overly simplified, but I don't much care -- they annoy me and I want them to bug off.

I've also found that neither people who accost me over the phone nor people who accost me in person are likely to be trustworthy. It's not worth the energy to figure out if any one particular instance is an exception to that rule. I think the Do Not Call list people are actually being rather reasonable -- after one puts one's name on a list of people not to be bothered, one expects to not be bothered, not to be told "Oh, we're a loophole"; and if one is handed the loophole line, it's easy to expect it to be a lie, because strangers who call and try to talk one into things often lie.

Re: Do Not Call issues

[identity profile] boojum.livejournal.com 2004-03-22 01:40 am (UTC)(link)
That isn't the way to accomplish the goal, but if I hadn't had phone behavior programmed in, I would probably have ended up doing it occasionally anyway. I cope really badly with strangers over the phone when stressed, sick, or sleepy. If I didn't have my basic arsenal of programmatic responses[1], I'd be SOL half the time.

Not that any of this makes it easier to cope with from the other side of the telephone.

[1] It's got things like "What is this about?" "I'm sorry; we're not interested *click*" "I'm sorry; [x] isn't home right now. Can I take a message?" and "I'm sorry; I think you have a wrong number." in it, as well as a basic set of instructions for getting into a less automatic headspace if the person genuinely wants to talk to me. If it's something outside of those parameters, I tend to have the sort of mishaps which are amusing only when they're happening to someone else.