azurelunatic: Vivid pink Alaskan wild rose. (Default)
Azure Jane Lunatic (Azz) 🌺 ([personal profile] azurelunatic) wrote2004-09-03 04:05 am

Still processing...

It's amazing. I've theoretically known this little handy fact since at least 2002, I should think. Time blurs together, but the first Lord of the Rings movie came out in December 2001, and that's a time anchor for the ensuing kerfuffle with [livejournal.com profile] digitalambience, [livejournal.com profile] ralmathon, [livejournal.com profile] teenagewitch, [livejournal.com profile] marxdarx, and the rest of the household. And that kerfuffle is the time anchor for how long I've held the theoretical knowledge of the depth of a thing.

So. 2002 was The Two Towers, and I hadn't figured it out.
2003 was Return of the King, and perhaps by then I had noted that if not for the one, then the other.

2004 is now.

I have been officially godsmacked.

Now I have to decide what to do about it, if anything, besides wait out what waiting there is, and discuss things with people.

There shan't be a full discussion of this until at least Saturday, if not Sunday or Monday, if then. Had I not been so absolutely floored, I would have remained sitting on this until then. I have a rule that when there is something going on, the most affected parties are informed first. If other parties need to be pulled in to help someone deal with something that is very weird shit, so be it, but things don't get talked about until the chain of discussion has been worked through.

If then.

I'm babbling, because my brain is so very broken. I can't help but scroll my brain backward to the Ides of March, 2000 -- is this a repeat? Dear fuck $DEITY shit, I hope not. Violation of Caesar's left toenail, I hope not. And if it is, I'll be warned about it and I will have the tools and experience to deal with it. Tay-tay, if you read this, I'm going to need to spend some argh-time with you over this. This is serious.

...Bechdel's Law. Bechdel's Law. Bechdel's Law. Anyone seen any monsters around?
ext_5285: (Default)

[identity profile] kiwiria.livejournal.com 2004-09-03 04:04 am (UTC)(link)
I'm intrigued, but fully understand your policy of telling the affected parties first.
ext_5285: (Default)

[identity profile] kiwiria.livejournal.com 2004-09-03 06:56 am (UTC)(link)
That's always scary. Best of luck with it.

[identity profile] ekaterin.livejournal.com 2004-09-03 07:15 am (UTC)(link)
You are ok? I understand you want to talk to those involved first, but I am just a bit worried. I'll be thinking of you.

Re: processing

[identity profile] wolfieboy.livejournal.com 2004-09-03 11:40 am (UTC)(link)
Good luck with your processing. I continue to work on mine.

Did you possibly mean gobsmacked?

Re: processing

[identity profile] wolfieboy.livejournal.com 2004-09-03 02:43 pm (UTC)(link)
I thought it might've been something like that but I figured that simple was better than complex in this case.

I did mean to ask what Bechdel's Law is though...

Re: processing

[identity profile] amberfox.livejournal.com 2004-09-04 02:22 pm (UTC)(link)
One, it must have at least two female characters.
Two, they must have a conversation.
Three, the conversation must be about something other than a man.

The last movie that our heroine had been able to watch was one of the alien movies, because the two chicks had talked about the monster.


Oh, I like that one!

Re: processing

[identity profile] wolfieboy.livejournal.com 2004-09-05 01:10 am (UTC)(link)
Yes, I know "Dykes to Watch Out For" but I'd missed this one. Continued good luck on the processing. I'm still working on the stopping the descent stage. Compartmentalizing when necessary has been useful.
My thoughts are with you...