Azure Jane Lunatic (Azz) 🌺 (
azurelunatic) wrote2005-04-09 01:54 pm
Dav*d W*b*r
So I mentioned David Weber in the context of "writers who are trying for an effect, but fail to get that effect, in such a way that other writers can tell what effect they were trying to get," and
shadesong asked if she should read him. (That was a comment over in her journal, but it's a long thread and I'm at work, so I can't actually visit LJ. Besides, it's always a good topic for a flamewar a group discussion...)
For those of us who are not familiar with him, David Weber primarily writes the Honor Harrington series, which is naval space opera with a strong female protagonist. If you do not care for any of the above, space opera, strong female protagonists where "strength" includes membership in a military and serious kicking of ass in said military, or the sorts of naval stories that involve Epic Battles and Ship Pr0n, this series is probably not for you. (It's really seriously heavy spaceship pr0n, and I tend to skim sometimes.) If you really like two of the three, but not the other, perhaps check out one book.
Weber is definitely not one of my buy-on-sight authors. There are some authors whose books I buy on sight, unread, hardback. He is not one. If there's a book I haven't read by him, I will read it if I see it at the library, or if a friend has a copy. If I like it, I might buy a used copy if I see one. He's not an author I seek out unless I am reminded to, despite the fact that he has characters who I like who are continually put into interesting and/or impossible situations. As
theferrett put it, he's one of my methadone authors. The potential for awesomeness is very high, but his actual follow-through is not particularly good, and for some reason, I do keep reading his stuff.
Almost all of his characters have a lot of potential. Almost all of his situations and worlds have a lot of potential. He is great with characterization and world-building and plot. The trouble is, he is not such a great story-teller. The characters and plot are almost enough to carry the story along, but when you have the writer's eye, especially if you've edited enough of your own stuff to know when you were trying for an effect and failed miserably, or else almost got there but just not quite, you recognize the signs.
So, people. Thoughts?
For those of us who are not familiar with him, David Weber primarily writes the Honor Harrington series, which is naval space opera with a strong female protagonist. If you do not care for any of the above, space opera, strong female protagonists where "strength" includes membership in a military and serious kicking of ass in said military, or the sorts of naval stories that involve Epic Battles and Ship Pr0n, this series is probably not for you. (It's really seriously heavy spaceship pr0n, and I tend to skim sometimes.) If you really like two of the three, but not the other, perhaps check out one book.
Weber is definitely not one of my buy-on-sight authors. There are some authors whose books I buy on sight, unread, hardback. He is not one. If there's a book I haven't read by him, I will read it if I see it at the library, or if a friend has a copy. If I like it, I might buy a used copy if I see one. He's not an author I seek out unless I am reminded to, despite the fact that he has characters who I like who are continually put into interesting and/or impossible situations. As
Almost all of his characters have a lot of potential. Almost all of his situations and worlds have a lot of potential. He is great with characterization and world-building and plot. The trouble is, he is not such a great story-teller. The characters and plot are almost enough to carry the story along, but when you have the writer's eye, especially if you've edited enough of your own stuff to know when you were trying for an effect and failed miserably, or else almost got there but just not quite, you recognize the signs.
So, people. Thoughts?

no subject
For awhile on the Baen Bar boards a friend of his was acting as a conduit for tech questions and political backstory and loose plot ends that wouldnt ruin upcoming books, but that has unfortunately stopped(said friend is in Europe dealing with a car accident that killed his son-inlaw and one grandchild, and helping his daughter and other granddaughter though surgerys).
I know what you mean about not so great at storytelling. I was SO looking forward to "We Few" from the March series...and there were some damned cool tidbits but some jarring distractions as well. A kidnapping that made little sense in the scheme of the book, and a section of spacecombat that you could tell Weber had just been DYING to write...but there was no emotional investment in any of the characters there and just ended up being a distraction to the plot. The best parts of the book were actually Ringo's work, especialy the ending. Had a ton of barflys over in Snerks saying "Ringo you BASTARD!! I'm not supposed to cry at the end of your books."
no subject
no subject
naa...Just means that in spite of his occasionaly bad storytelling, its still good enough to tickle your fancy.
no subject
no subject
The problem is he wants be doing huge-scale stuff. This is the guy who wrote the grand-strategic interstellar empires rules for Starfire, after all. But he can't make it that interesting to people other than wargamers. And if I'm reading stuff in my wargamer persona I want better maps, including tactical dispositions.
Teaming him with Ringo seems to be working well so far. I've got qualms about the next book, though. Seems very likely to get plotted by breaking out the Imperial Starfire set and gaming out the battles, which would lose everything I've liked about the series so far.
no subject
I wonder how many people would appreciate a convenient summary of the Epic Spaceship Battles? There's just enough character interaction in them to barely drag them through; I like Bujold's much, much better.
The thing I really did not like about one Epic Spaceship Bit was where one of the characters started rattling off the tech specs on the stuff to the captain (I think it was some Peep or other; I'm never going to look at Easter the same; I wonder if there are any hardcore Weber fans who have ever wound up with a cat attacking marshmallow chicks around Easter and just cracked up laughing) in a bit of Supposedly Subtle Exposition where someone techier-than-thou explains things to someone who should have known it already, and the captain looks at the person, and says, "I knew that already. Why did you just tell me the abridged version for no particular reason at this juncture?" and the techie says, approximately, "Um..." If you must infodump ... ack.
no subject
FWIW, On Basilisk Station, The Honor of the Queen and Changer of Worlds are available from Baen Free Library.
no subject
no subject
no subject