Azure Jane Lunatic (Azz) 🌺 (
azurelunatic) wrote2006-06-19 08:58 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
LJ Social Hacking Meme
LiveJournal is under the assumption that the bulk of the userbase are 18 year old girls. Thus there is the addition of features aimed at 18 year old girls.
Things like nudge, and advertisements and the like.
Well. The statistics say that the bulk of the users are 18 years old because the older users don't list ages. After all, the older people get, the less likely they are to divulge their age. There is a big difference between 18 and 16 and 21. Between 35 and 39? Not nearly so much.
So:Help correct the demographics. Go to http://www.livejournal.com/manage/profile/ and specify your full DOB, including your year of birth. If you don't want it displayed on your profile for everyone to see, uncheck the box that says " Show your birthday to other users".
Thats it. Three ticky boxes and LJ realizes that another adult is on board.
PS: Remember how many of you have multiple journals? Might be time to update them all. And pass this on. It's important.
And yes, I know there are people who aren't giving out their ages because they're concerned that LJ might be doing horrible things with the data. If you're concerned about this, significantly older than 18, and think that "nudge" is a horrible thing? Then know that they are doing horrible things based on the data, but probably not the kind you were thinking about.
In Support volunteer circles, there's an analogy that comes up every time people start seriously complaining about changes that are essentially cosmetic: "Does it really matter what color they paint the bikeshed?" The answer is generally along the lines of, "It doesn't really -- it can always be repainted so long as it's not rotten or smashed up or something."
LJ, of course, is the bikeshed.
The structure of LJ is the nitty-gritty details of how it works and runs and stores stuff and doesn't smash when ten thousand people all post that quiz telling them what brand of kitty litter they are. (Most sites, if they get "slashdotted", or linked to so that a whole big group of people come to them at once, go down badly, from lack of bandwidth and lack of machinepower to handle the influx. LJ barely gets a blip when slashdotted, and mentioning /. in a
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
The structure is the power staying on at the host. :-P
The structure is the social contract between LJ and the users saying that the users will not try to destroy LJ and everything it stands for, and LJ will keep the users' content safe and provide as positive an environment as you can get when you have a million typing monkeys using the service. (Propz to the Abuse team.)
The paint on the bikeshed is all the cosmetic details of the site, and some of the extra bells and whistles. Sometimes there are some very tacky and wrong things done to people's journals, never mind the main site pages. That Christmas banner? Paint. The blue cprod box giving features of the site? Paint. Excolibur vs. Dystopia? The most painty paint you can get (short of the Random Flashing Fangirl Layout from Hell). Nudge? Those tacky out-of-key windchimes that someone hung up because they thought they were cool, and everyone wants to take them down but no one quite knows where the ladder is.
There are really mixed feelings about ads. The pro-ad or neutral camps tend to regard them as paint. The anti-ad camp views it as a threat to the structural social contract of the site, or a sign that the social contract was never as strong as we thought it was.
At the end of the day, though, the stuff that keeps us on LJ instead of taking our bike and finding another shed -- that's the structure. That's the stuff we want to keep. And so far, LJ's been doing pretty well. There are a lot of users picking this site and sticking around. The site does have a reputation for collecting overdramatic teenage girls, but really, there are a lot more interesting people on this site than that. It's a good place and I like it.
...and, anybody got a spare bucket of paint?
no subject
I like LJ, use it for a variety of things:
And since LJ costs money, profit is necessary.
Some people call me a consumer whore, but honestly, I did it all for the icons...and the mood theme...and the voice post. But mostly for the icons.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Bring it on, LJ. *beckons with two fingers*
no subject
...though I was really expecting you to use the blinky icon for this one, because the blinky icon is classic bikeshed.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
*stabby, stabby*
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
( My month and year have always been in there :-) )
no subject
no subject
Actually that's more than paint. THe default LJ browse option (Excolibur) is not accessibility friendly. I use voice recognition software sometimes (chronic RSI sufferer) and VR does not work with Excolibur. Dystopia makes much more sense, and works fine.
The good part is that I cribbed about Excolibur to support, and they advised shifting over to Dystopia. So, I'm thinking they know why the two of them are needed.
no subject
*slinks away*
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
by the way, 'song directed me over here.
no subject
no subject
I hate the advertising, too, but the great thing about LJ is that it is still optional. When they start pounding my paid (or just plain free) account with those aneurism-inducing "Shoot the Cockroach and win an iPod" banners, then all is lost. But for those willing to put up with that crap, it's a good way to get the perks for free. I guess it's nice for students or people on a tight budget.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
- Someone who works for SixApart
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject