azurelunatic: DW: my eloquence cannot be captured in 140 chars (twitter)
Azure Jane Lunatic (Azz) 🌺 ([personal profile] azurelunatic) wrote2009-05-29 11:55 pm
Entry tags:

39 tweets for 2009-5-29

In the last 24 hours, I posted the following to Twitter:


Follow me on Twitter.

[identity profile] tygerr.livejournal.com 2009-05-30 05:30 pm (UTC)(link)
Okay, I'm confused. You link to the Cory Doctorow post in which he notes that Canada is upset with him. He provides a link. That link leads to a Twitter which contends Canada is upset with Doctorow, and provides a link. Clicking on THAT link leads recursively back to the Doctorow post in a self-referential circle.

Is there any actual evidence that Canada has even noticed him?
foxfirefey: A fox colored like flame over an ornately framed globe (Default)

[personal profile] foxfirefey 2009-05-30 06:53 pm (UTC)(link)
That's what I've been wondering!
foxfirefey: A fox colored like flame over an ornately framed globe (Default)

[personal profile] foxfirefey 2009-05-30 06:52 pm (UTC)(link)
# Friday, 0804: .@ZorkFox One word: Brad. (Not personally aware of all the history on this one myself but most questionable LJ legacy codebase = Brad.)

To be fair, I think, it's not so much questionable as it's just old. Ten years ago during the time, I don't know if any blog system used slugs. It's just not one of the things that LJ updated over the years. Some of that has to do, I think, with it not being as much of a priority on LJ as on other blogging systems, because of LJ's friends page delivery mechanism. Some of it might have to do with economy, too--LJ was squeezing every last ounce of hardware, and I think it's less computationally intensive to look up an indexed number in a database than translate a slug.
Edited 2009-05-30 18:53 (UTC)
wibbble: A manipulated picture of my eye, with a blue swirling background. (Default)

[personal profile] wibbble 2009-05-30 11:04 pm (UTC)(link)
So you know, your @-replies prefixed with '.' don't appear like old-style @-replies. Your client must be setting 'in_reply_to_status_id', which causes Twitter to vanish it regardless of anything else.

I suspect this will also screw up some people's RTs.
wibbble: A manipulated picture of my eye, with a blue swirling background. (Default)

[personal profile] wibbble 2009-05-31 11:48 am (UTC)(link)
It does work, just so long as your client doesn't fill in that option. Twitterific for Mac doesn't fill it in, so it works there. Twitterific for iPhone does fill it in, so I don't do it on the iPhone.

Twitterific on the iPhone also fills it in when you retweet, so I suspect that no one would see anything I retweet from there either.

Stupid Twitter.
wibbble: A manipulated picture of my eye, with a blue swirling background. (Default)

[personal profile] wibbble 2009-05-31 10:16 pm (UTC)(link)
That's what they said they were going to implement, but who knows if they actually did?
wibbble: A manipulated picture of my eye, with a blue swirling background. (Default)

[personal profile] wibbble 2009-05-31 11:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Didn't see it, so looks like they never got around to setting up that thing they 'could do quickly'.

Meh.