azurelunatic: Abstract.  (bondmates)
Azure Jane Lunatic (Azz) 🌺 ([personal profile] azurelunatic) wrote2009-05-23 07:31 am

Writer's Block: There Can Be Only One

Do you believe in monogamy?

View 501 Answers


I join the crowds who say "What kind of fool question is this?" and "Monogamy is not Santa Claus". Does monogamy care whether I believe in it? Would monogamy exist if I didn't believe in it?

But the intent of the question!

I believe that it is possible, in general, for some human beings to behave monogamously. I believe that some human beings are wired to pair-bond monogamously. I know that I am one of the humans that requires an intense pair-bond in order to behave monogamously, and that forcing me to behave monogamously in the absence of that pair-bond is a recipe for disaster.

I also know that it is unlikely for me to achieve a mutual pair-bond like that at this time. So monogamy can go suck it.

[identity profile] raranax.livejournal.com 2009-05-23 03:43 pm (UTC)(link)
But if you don't believe, come valentines day, Monogamy will leave coal in your condom.

[identity profile] raranax.livejournal.com 2009-05-23 04:10 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, come Jesus' re-birthday a bunny might leave a strap-on under your basket. But only if you believe in him. And if the police don't arrest him for being publicly seen in a fur suit.

Define this heterosexuality that you do not believe in. Simply not believing that there are no heterosexuals is not enough, unless you believe that there is no variability. (Heterosexual can be defined as the limit, even if there are no people actually there)

[identity profile] raranax.livejournal.com 2009-05-23 05:54 pm (UTC)(link)
I guess it depends on wether or not the strategic velcro flaps are open or not.

So you believe in heterosexuality, but not that there are people who are heterosexual.

I would like a firmer (hur hur hur) definition of what you think a ____-sexual is. For fun, lets define a measure gamma, ... humm I think this would work better as a pdf

http://senduit.com/e1d9cf (Expires in one week)

[identity profile] raranax.livejournal.com 2009-05-23 06:00 pm (UTC)(link)
The real question is what the lowest probability of preferring man that is allowed to translate arabic for the military. "Sorry, you are under .95, we researched your porn, you're out."

[identity profile] raranax.livejournal.com 2009-05-23 06:04 pm (UTC)(link)
What do you mean by demographic here? like http://www.furnitureporn.com/ ? "I would not screw that man, but the couch he is sitting on is HOTT!"

[identity profile] raranax.livejournal.com 2009-05-23 09:04 pm (UTC)(link)
By demographic you mean porn for hetero-men, porn for hetero women, porn for homo women, porn for homo men?

I think that the lines between those demographics are too blurry. Just because it is marketed at one demographic does not mean that it could not be marketed at another.
wibbble: A manipulated picture of my eye, with a blue swirling background. (Default)

[personal profile] wibbble 2009-05-23 10:57 pm (UTC)(link)
Eye-tracking would give it away, although haxxoring your webcam might be seen as being a /little/ invasive.

For extra-special invasiveness, there's the 'are you actually gay' test, which involves wearing a device which measures your level of arousal while they show you various types of porn and non-porn images.

I think that if they're going to be cocks and ban gay people from military service, 'don't ask, don't tell' is better than 'run a test to find out'.
Edited 2009-05-23 22:57 (UTC)

[identity profile] raranax.livejournal.com 2009-05-24 12:28 am (UTC)(link)
In the case above I was thinking more along the lines of him watching man-man porn.

Also I think most heterosexual porn is more focused on the woman. From the little I have seen it is mostly a girl and then a cock pokes on from some side of the screen.

[identity profile] krinchan.livejournal.com 2009-05-25 03:47 pm (UTC)(link)
O.O;

I just finished Discreet Math this spring and all of that MADE SENSE!!!!! *SQUEE*

Uh...wondered here from meta-quotes...and am sooooooo keeping that pretty PDF around for a while.

[identity profile] raranax.livejournal.com 2009-05-25 04:36 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, LaTeX gets me all hot and bothered too. Although apparently just by knowing it one's crusty academic rating goes though the roof.

I really should have used the marvosym \Female \Male \FemaleFemale ... \Hermaphrodite symbols.

[identity profile] raranax.livejournal.com 2009-05-25 08:08 pm (UTC)(link)
There you go:

http://senduit.com/bb9198 (expires in one week)

[identity profile] tygerr.livejournal.com 2009-05-25 03:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Important safety tip! The Beltane Bunny thanks you!

[identity profile] adalger.livejournal.com 2009-05-25 02:09 pm (UTC)(link)
I just had to metaquote this.

[identity profile] amiga500.livejournal.com 2009-05-23 04:14 pm (UTC)(link)
I believe in monogamy, and ghosts, but I do not believe in the Tooth Fairy.

Seriously, who worded that question?

[identity profile] tangerinedreams.livejournal.com 2009-06-07 10:55 pm (UTC)(link)
THIS.