Azure Jane Lunatic (Azz) 🌺 (
azurelunatic) wrote2015-09-06 01:36 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Terminology and (my) sexuality
I was finally able to put my finger on the thing that's been nagging at me with regard to me specifically with pansexuality vs. bisexuality.
So the traditional, binary-gendered definition of bisexuality is:
I can be sexually attracted to both genders: male and female.
The modern and non-binary inclusive definition of bisexuality is:
I can be sexually attracted to both people of my own gender and people of different genders.
(Note that my gender has been *eyeroll* "well, I have a uterus, so ... maybe as an honorary status? but it's really not very applicable..." when filling out forms lately. So "my gender" is a pretty small group, and people firmly in the Men and Women camps are both in "different genders" these days.)
Pansexuality attempts to explicitly challenge the gender binary (as implied by the traditional definition of bisexuality), and states:
I can be sexually attracted to people from any of the vast collection of gender identities that exist.
I ditched the traditional definition of "bisexual" as applies to myself as soon as I became aware that a) there were people who were outside the gender binary, and b) I had encountered enough non-binary-gendered people to know that they were a diverse group with different traits and personalities that included people I liked and who had not earned an immediate personality based disqualification from dating me.
However, some small groups of people do occasionally collect themselves together and tend to share traits which would be dealbreakers if they ever considered applying to date me. Groupings in the gender pandemonium are not exempt, though I do always try to keep an open mind until I've encountered a reasonable sample size.
"Pansexuality" implies that gender identification or gender expression is never a dealbreaker if I'm reviewing a relationship application.
"Dudebro" is a fairly distinct gender expression.
Sorry, dudebros. I'm bisexual, but the odds are not in your favor here.
So the traditional, binary-gendered definition of bisexuality is:
I can be sexually attracted to both genders: male and female.
The modern and non-binary inclusive definition of bisexuality is:
I can be sexually attracted to both people of my own gender and people of different genders.
(Note that my gender has been *eyeroll* "well, I have a uterus, so ... maybe as an honorary status? but it's really not very applicable..." when filling out forms lately. So "my gender" is a pretty small group, and people firmly in the Men and Women camps are both in "different genders" these days.)
Pansexuality attempts to explicitly challenge the gender binary (as implied by the traditional definition of bisexuality), and states:
I can be sexually attracted to people from any of the vast collection of gender identities that exist.
I ditched the traditional definition of "bisexual" as applies to myself as soon as I became aware that a) there were people who were outside the gender binary, and b) I had encountered enough non-binary-gendered people to know that they were a diverse group with different traits and personalities that included people I liked and who had not earned an immediate personality based disqualification from dating me.
However, some small groups of people do occasionally collect themselves together and tend to share traits which would be dealbreakers if they ever considered applying to date me. Groupings in the gender pandemonium are not exempt, though I do always try to keep an open mind until I've encountered a reasonable sample size.
"Pansexuality" implies that gender identification or gender expression is never a dealbreaker if I'm reviewing a relationship application.
"Dudebro" is a fairly distinct gender expression.
Sorry, dudebros. I'm bisexual, but the odds are not in your favor here.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
The best status.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
http://azurelunatic.tumblr.com/post/142226589257/birchsoda-nazmat-hotanimebabe-straight
It was so hard to google for, but I finally found it.
no subject
no subject
no subject
I think mine is "women and NB people but not men," with the complication that if there were a Kinsey type scale where completely allosexual is 0 and completely asexual is 6, I'd be about a 4.
Which means that "bisexual" would be technically accurate for me, but in practice I don't want to identify myself as bi because I am very averse to men thinking I'm potentially interested in them, and that's the default assumption people will draw.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject